End Stop Loss Now

www.endstoploss.com

Military Families Speak Out - Challenge to Pentagon's Stop Loss Policy

Print the article

This entry was posted on 9/25/2007 6:57 PM and is filed under Suzanne's Column.

I received this e-mail today.  Please contact MFSO if you have a loved one or you are under stop loss orders.  Also, if you know of other soldiers who are, please send to them, also.

Dear Members of Military Families Speak Out,

As you may know, "Stop Loss" -- part of the "back-door draft" -- continues to hold service men and women in the military beyond their enlistment dates. This Pentagon policy was challenged in 2005 by a group of soldiers who were being held in the military beyond the end-dates of their military contracts.  A very unfortunate ruling came out of a three-judge panel in the Federal 9th Circuit Court in Washington State in April, 2005. This ruling basically said that the military contract can not be  viewed in the same was as an employment contract. An employment contract binds both sides to the agreement. In a military contract, the ruling said that service men and women have to live up to everything they sign on to in that contract, but the military (the government) is not bound by that contract in a number of significant ways. The ruling said that the government and the military has larger issues to be concerned with, such as national security, and therefore can make decisions to hold service men and women in the service indefinitely.
The Military Law Task Force of the National Lawyers Guild is considering bringing new challenges to the Pentagon's Stop Loss policy. In order to do this, they will need service men and women currently affected by stop-loss orders to bring lawsuits against this policy.

If your loved one(s) is/are currently serving under stop-loss orders and he or she would consider being part of a lawsuit challenging the Pentagon's stop-loss orders, please email us at mfso@mfso.org . We will then get you in contact with those involved in exploring the legalities of such a case.

In Peace and Solidarity,
Nancy Lessin and Charley Richardson
Co-founders, Military Families Speak Out
mfso@mfso.org
www.mfso.org

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 5/8/2008 3:42 PM brad wrote:
      I would like to say no one has tackled "ANY" of the most pertinent issues at hand, number one which is probably a number like 1000, the end of the occupation of iraq before real threats start coming true not ""al queada" deploying after a falsified war which sent and continues to send undertrained, the first 30,000 none speaking arabic. now 3.2 MILLION POW'S in Iraq detained which are probably 98 percent innocent. Look up the faces of death video and the formoral Corporal from Bellmore Long Island about the five six day destroying every citizen of Fallujah's birth certificates so they would not be paid back help from the unified World Effort or the U.S. 's involvement to cover up our massive wrongs, debts, and lives lost for oil. Why do you think oil is so expensive right now. Let someone who can drive run the show.
      Reply to this
      1. 5/8/2008 4:54 PM Suzanne Miller wrote:
        Sir,

        I would like to say that this is a forum about stop loss.  I find it amazing that you mention "death video" and "massive wrongs" in the same breath but there seems to be no outrage on your part about al-Zaquari beheading a 26 year old American citizen and others; Iraqis dragging the burned torsos of our men in uniform through the streets and I could go on and on.  The beheadings were all videotaped.  Where is your outrage about that?  I want this war to end, too, but to suggest that our fine young men and women in uniform have acted in any other way but an exemplary manner when the enemy looks like the friend, mortars are fired every few seconds at anything and everything, IEDs are designed to do as much damage as possible and tours are being extended to 15 months is ridiculous.  I don't care about oil.  I want stop loss to end - we have 300,000+ soldiers who have PTSD and the VA won't treat them unless they were not injured.  Where is your outrage about that?  As far as running the show, ending stop loss, and getting us out of Iraq, there is no candidate running at this time that I believe can or will do that.  Again, this is about ending stop loss.  Those young people are sent back against their will and the VA can't treat the PTSD????  If you want to be outraged about something, get outraged about that.
        Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.